Wall of Ideas: Difference between revisions

From CCN Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=Preamble= The wall ideas is a digital version of the list on the whiteboard. It's a list of stray ideas that come up randomly when vacuuming or loading the dishwasher or duri...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 20: Line 20:
**We have feature production data and imagery and fMRI data for some number of participants.
**We have feature production data and imagery and fMRI data for some number of participants.
**Is there a relationship between the probability of listing features of different types and their imagery?
**Is there a relationship between the probability of listing features of different types and their imagery?
*Bayes Category Sensitivity
*Bayes Category Sensitivity (Avery)
**I'm not sure what I was talking about here. It might be the toggling thing.
**Using category affiliation scores for a series of classifier networks in a Monte Carlo design
**Uses Horikawa data
*Feature Production to MRI Babelfish (Josh)
*Feature Production to MRI Babelfish (Josh)
**We have fMRI patterns and feature listings for the same concepts
**We have fMRI patterns and feature listings for the same concepts
**Can we find a relationship between, e.g., listing many auditory features and regional fMRI activity?
**Can we find a relationship between, e.g., listing many auditory features and regional fMRI activity?
**Similar to the sensibility project, but on an individual differences level
**Similar to the sensibility project, but on an individual differences level

Latest revision as of 15:46, 18 February 2020

Preamble

The wall ideas is a digital version of the list on the whiteboard. It's a list of stray ideas that come up randomly when vacuuming or loading the dishwasher or during lab meeting. There's more ideas here than we can possibly explore, but it's a handy tool for those times when you think, "well, now what?"

The List

  • Sensibility project (Jen, Erica)
    • What sensorimotor modalities are salient (i.e., are "sensible") when you think about different categories?
    • What makes them sensible? When answering this question, make sure your argument isn't circular!
  • Classification Constrains Connectivity
    • We already showed the reverse.
    • The ABCD project data is going to sort of touch on this, but I wasn't planning on comparing a MCN vs. conventional connectivity
    • Would probably benefit from some synthetic or benchmark dataset where we have a reference outcome
  • In what domains does connectivity help classification?
    • We showed the classifier was better when the autoencoder was present. Does this hold in other domains?
    • Thinking genetics. The animal folks have some data.
  • Graph Neural Networks (Chandola)
    • Convolutional Neural Networks in the graph domain
  • Randazzo Data
    • Classifiers applied to EEG data to diagnose HoH from controls
  • Feature Production Stream of Consciousness
    • We have feature production data and imagery and fMRI data for some number of participants.
    • Is there a relationship between the probability of listing features of different types and their imagery?
  • Bayes Category Sensitivity (Avery)
    • Using category affiliation scores for a series of classifier networks in a Monte Carlo design
    • Uses Horikawa data
  • Feature Production to MRI Babelfish (Josh)
    • We have fMRI patterns and feature listings for the same concepts
    • Can we find a relationship between, e.g., listing many auditory features and regional fMRI activity?
    • Similar to the sensibility project, but on an individual differences level