Wall of Ideas: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Preamble= The wall ideas is a digital version of the list on the whiteboard. It's a list of stray ideas that come up randomly when vacuuming or loading the dishwasher or duri...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
**We have feature production data and imagery and fMRI data for some number of participants. | **We have feature production data and imagery and fMRI data for some number of participants. | ||
**Is there a relationship between the probability of listing features of different types and their imagery? | **Is there a relationship between the probability of listing features of different types and their imagery? | ||
*Bayes Category Sensitivity | *Bayes Category Sensitivity (Avery) | ||
** | **Using category affiliation scores for a series of classifier networks in a Monte Carlo design | ||
**Uses Horikawa data | |||
*Feature Production to MRI Babelfish (Josh) | *Feature Production to MRI Babelfish (Josh) | ||
**We have fMRI patterns and feature listings for the same concepts | **We have fMRI patterns and feature listings for the same concepts | ||
**Can we find a relationship between, e.g., listing many auditory features and regional fMRI activity? | **Can we find a relationship between, e.g., listing many auditory features and regional fMRI activity? | ||
**Similar to the sensibility project, but on an individual differences level | **Similar to the sensibility project, but on an individual differences level |
Latest revision as of 15:46, 18 February 2020
Preamble
The wall ideas is a digital version of the list on the whiteboard. It's a list of stray ideas that come up randomly when vacuuming or loading the dishwasher or during lab meeting. There's more ideas here than we can possibly explore, but it's a handy tool for those times when you think, "well, now what?"
The List
- Sensibility project (Jen, Erica)
- What sensorimotor modalities are salient (i.e., are "sensible") when you think about different categories?
- What makes them sensible? When answering this question, make sure your argument isn't circular!
- Classification Constrains Connectivity
- We already showed the reverse.
- The ABCD project data is going to sort of touch on this, but I wasn't planning on comparing a MCN vs. conventional connectivity
- Would probably benefit from some synthetic or benchmark dataset where we have a reference outcome
- In what domains does connectivity help classification?
- We showed the classifier was better when the autoencoder was present. Does this hold in other domains?
- Thinking genetics. The animal folks have some data.
- Graph Neural Networks (Chandola)
- Convolutional Neural Networks in the graph domain
- Randazzo Data
- Classifiers applied to EEG data to diagnose HoH from controls
- Feature Production Stream of Consciousness
- We have feature production data and imagery and fMRI data for some number of participants.
- Is there a relationship between the probability of listing features of different types and their imagery?
- Bayes Category Sensitivity (Avery)
- Using category affiliation scores for a series of classifier networks in a Monte Carlo design
- Uses Horikawa data
- Feature Production to MRI Babelfish (Josh)
- We have fMRI patterns and feature listings for the same concepts
- Can we find a relationship between, e.g., listing many auditory features and regional fMRI activity?
- Similar to the sensibility project, but on an individual differences level